<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I Already Googled It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rleahy.ca/blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog</link>
	<description>Technology and Libertarianism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 18:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;May Day&#8221; Shameful &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/may-day-shameful-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/may-day-shameful-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collectivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walking from the office to the parkade, I walked through Centennial Square and was disgusted by the communists out in force. Got home and wrote/sent this: Today – May 1st – is “International Workers Day”, and consequently the communists were decorating Centennial Square with their signs and slogans. I must question why people flirt – [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/may-day-shameful-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Higher Unemployment or Higher Prices? &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/higher-unemployment-or-higher-prices-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/higher-unemployment-or-higher-prices-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 00:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The minimum wage here in B.C. recently jumped from the lowest in Canada to the highest ($10.25). I sent a letter to the editor to honour the occasion: Today the minimum wage in B.C. rose to $10.25. Despite what many people may instinctually believe, this is not a good thing.  In fact, a higher minimum [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/higher-unemployment-or-higher-prices-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opening Mail Attachment Warning &#8211; How to Suppress Programmatically</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/random/opening-mail-attachment-warning-how-to-suppress-programmatically/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/random/opening-mail-attachment-warning-how-to-suppress-programmatically/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Random]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps you&#8217;ve seen this dialog when using Microsoft Outlook: You may have noticed that occasionally the &#8220;[a]lways ask before opening this type of file&#8221; is greyed out—as it is in the screenshot above. There&#8217;s actually some very interesting Windows heritage to this. For backwards compatibility (the hallmark of all things weird and interesting in MS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/random/opening-mail-attachment-warning-how-to-suppress-programmatically/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Deductions Defy Equality and Fairness &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/tax-deductions-defy-equality-and-fairness-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/tax-deductions-defy-equality-and-fairness-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this: It is nonsensical to oppose “legislatures […] buy[ing] votes with other provinces’ money”, and yet advocate “tax recognition for the costs of raising children”.  They are the same thing. In one instance, costs are transferred from the people of one province to the people of another.  In another, costs are transferred [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/tax-deductions-defy-equality-and-fairness-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violence is not a Solution &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/violence-is-not-a-solution-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/violence-is-not-a-solution-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this: Every controversial event is followed by cries of “there ought to be a law!”  I imagine the people crying out do not consider the implications thereof: If someone went independently to a car dealership, discovered they were – for example – selling cars capable of a top speed of over 150km/h, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/violence-is-not-a-solution-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Everything Equally &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/tax-everything-equally-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/tax-everything-equally-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collectivism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individualism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this (and some pent up angst about collectivism in general): The question “[w]hat do we want our city to look like?” demonstrates a common fallacy and blight upon politics: That “the people” collectively own the sum of wealth available, and that “owners” merely hold some portion at the leisure of “the people”. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/tax-everything-equally-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Mob Rule &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/no-mob-rule-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/no-mob-rule-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 18:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this: People crying for “proportional representation” ought to consider their premises. Why is 51% the magic number?  Why is gaining control of the country with the vote of 51 out of every 100 people somehow more legitimate than gaining control with 40 out of every 100 people? If you are a member [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/no-mob-rule-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robocopy Returns 1 on Success, and How This Affects DiskShadow and Backups</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/technology/robocopy-returns-1-on-success-and-how-this-affects-diskshadow-and-backups/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/technology/robocopy-returns-1-on-success-and-how-this-affects-diskshadow-and-backups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 23:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diskshadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robocopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Programs may return a code when they exit.  In C this is the value that main returns.  By convention, success is 0, failure is non-zero. Apparently, however, the developers of Robocopy &#8212; which is otherwise an exemplary and indispensable utility &#8211; didn&#8217;t get this memo, which caused a problem that plagued me for 2.5 years. A bit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/technology/robocopy-returns-1-on-success-and-how-this-affects-diskshadow-and-backups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Another Dime for the Public Sector &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/not-another-dime-for-the-public-sector-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/not-another-dime-for-the-public-sector-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this: The reason that unions exist is to collectively bargain on behalf of their members, but this only works when both parties have equal and opposite incentives.  Management in the private sector has an incentive to minimize costs, whereas workers have an incentive to maximize wages and benefits.  Their relationship is adversarial, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/not-another-dime-for-the-public-sector-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People Taking Transit Not Only Ones Providing Subsidy &#8211; Letter to the Editor</title>
		<link>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/people-taking-transit-not-only-ones-providing-subsidy-letter-to-the-editor/</link>
		<comments>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/people-taking-transit-not-only-ones-providing-subsidy-letter-to-the-editor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rleahy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letter to the Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rleahy.ca/blog/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to this: Rob Maxwell states that as someone who “usually walks, cycles, or takes transit” he “resent[s] having to subsidize the ‘free’ parking for those who choose to drive”. Does he not realize that the transit he so proudly takes does not turn a profit?  That the revenue from fares and tickets does [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://rleahy.ca/blog/libertarianism/people-taking-transit-not-only-ones-providing-subsidy-letter-to-the-editor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

